12/18/2023 0 Comments Using latex in macdownTexts in Markdown are almost human-readable due to its lightweight markup syntax.In the following I’d like to provide some guidance to answers this question. My final conclusion is, that it’s definitely not a question of either…or, it’s rather a question of “ When is it better to use $\LaTeX$, and when to use Markdown?”. You can also skip this comparison and jump directly to the conclusions. You can see what they have in common and what is possible only with one of the languages, while the same feature is missing at the other one. In the subsequent sections I face some relevant markups from both languages. But as soon as you have passed the first hurdles, writing becomes effortless and you will more and more focus just on your content. Of course, one first has to learn some basic markups and their syntax, and the learning curve for $\LaTeX$ is a bit steeper. Also, both Markdown and $\LaTeX$ documents are written in plain text as opposed to the formatted text found in WYSIWYG (“ What You See Is What You Get”) word processors.Īnother commonality is that both languages rely on markups, commands embedded within the text, e.g., to generate bold or italicized formatting. However, both have in common that they help to focus just on creating the content of the document rather than getting distracted by thinking about, e.g., the appropriate placing of figures and tables or the embedding and maintaining of a bibliography or a table of contents. Only when it comes to creating a bibliography, $\LaTeX$ still excels due to the effortless embedding of BibTeX ꜛ files. This concerns the effortless typesetting as well as the representation of mathematical expressions, figures and tables. Today it is easily possible to write academic texts with Markdown that are as appealing and sophisticated as with $\LaTeX$. While $\LaTeX$ is designed to cover a broad academic spectrum, Markdown wants to remain as little complex as possible so that the user can concentrate even more on the content.īut this does not mean that you cannot write scientific documents with Markdown. We see, that the targeted purposes of both languages are different. It also has a prominent role in the preparation and publication of books and articles, especially when they contain complex typographic elements such as Greek letters or mathematical expressions. It is widely used in academia for the communication and publication of scientific documents in many fields (e.g., mathematics, statistics, computer science, engineering, physics, economics, linguistics, quantitative psychology, philosophy, and political science). LaTeX is a markup language for creating simple to complex documents. Markdown is widely used in blogging, instant messaging, online forums, collaborative software, documentation pages, and README files. John Gruber and Aaron Swartz created Markdown in 2004 as a markup language that is appealing to human readers in its source code form. Markdown is a lightweight markup language for creating formatted text using a plain-text editor. Let’s first have a look on the initially defined purposes of both languages: In this post I’d like to give some guidance when it comes to the decision “ When to use Markdown and when to use $\LaTeX$?”, especially in the aspect of scientific writing. Both are markup languages ꜛ with different syntax, designed for partly overlapping as well as differing typesetting applications. Comparing the purposes of both languagesĪ few days ago, I added a Markdown and a $\LaTeX$ guide to the general teaching materials in the teaching section.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |